Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at explaining the differences in the results of empirical studies of motivations for local privatization by undertaking a meta-regression. Our results suggest that fiscal constraints and interest groups were especially relevant in the early studies of the US, which considered several services. Further, studies that focus on one service capture the influence of scale economies more accurately. Finally, our results show that small towns are more affected by fiscal and political factors, while ideology plays a major role for European and large cities. Thus, no clear conclusions emerge from this literature because the findings of each study are sensitive to its characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, M., de Groot, H. L. F., & Florax, R. J. G. M. (2005). A meta-analysis of β-convergence: the legendary 2%. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 389–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bel, G., & Costas, A. (2006). Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in Spain. Journal of Policy Reform, 9, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2007). Why do local governments privatize local services? A survey of empirical studies. Local Government Studies, 33, 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2008). Local privatization, intermunicipal cooperation, transaction costs and political interests: evidence from Spain. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 11, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel, G., & Miralles, A. (2003). Factors influencing privatization of urban solid waste collection in Spain. Urban Studies, 40, 1323–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel, G., & Miralles, A. (2006). Political and economic determinants of public services financing (Working Paper). Universitat de Barcelona.

  • Bel, G., & Warner, M. (2008, in press). Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation & Recycling.

  • Benton, J. E., & Menzel, D. C. (1992). Contracting and franchising county services in Florida. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27, 436–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., Potosky, M., & Slyke, D. V. (2008). Changing modes of service delivery: costs and constraints. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, T. D., & Feuille, P. (1994). Cities, unions, and the privatization of sanitation services. Journal of Labor Research, 15, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, H., & Paldam, M. (2003). Markets and municipalities: a study of the behavior of the danish municipalities. Public Choice, 114, 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, E., & Gradus, R. H. J. M. (2007). Collusion in the Dutch waste collection market. Local Government Studies, 33, 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. H. J. M., & Melenberg, B. (2003). Contracting out refuse collection. Empirical economics, 28, 553–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domberger, S., & Jensen, P. (1997). Contracting out by the public sector: theory, evidence, prospects. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, J. D. (1989). The privatization decision. Public ends, private means. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J. A., & Navarro, P. (1988). How markets for impure public goods organize: the case of household refuse collection. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4, 217–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, T. R. (1986). Efficiency and the provision of municipal services. Harvard University: Unpublished doctoral thesis.

  • Ferris, J. M. (1986). The decision to contract out: an empirical analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J., & Graddy, E. (1988). Production choices for local government services. Journal of Urban Affairs, 10, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J., & Graddy, E. (1994). Organizational choices for public service supply. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 10, 126–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Quevedo, J. (2004). Do public subsidies complement business R&D?: a meta-analysis of the econometric evidence. Kyklos, 57, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: a review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25, 637–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (1996). Cities and privatization: examining the effects of fiscal stress, location, and wealth in medium-sized cities. Policy Studies Journal, 24, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebdon, R., & Jalette, P. (2008). The restructuring of municipal services: a Canada–United States Comparison. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, W. Z. (1995). Factors important in local governments’ privatization decisions. Urban Affairs Review, 31, 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, G. A. (2000). Privatization. An international review of performance. Boulder: Press Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodrzycki, Y. K. (1998). Fiscal pressures and the privatization of local services. New England Economic Review, January/February, 39–50.

  • Levin, J., & Tadelis, S. (2008, in press). Contracting for government services: theory and evidence from US cities. Journal of Industrial Economics.

  • Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2005). A meta-analytic assessment of the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 451–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Privatization in the United States. Rand Journal of Economics, 28, 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Rodríguez, J. (2004). Los determinantes de la contratación externa de servicios municipales en España. Murcia: Asociación Murciana de Ciencia Regional.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. A., Ohsfeldt, R. L., & Van Cott, T. N. (1987). The determinants of the choice between public and private production of publicly funded service. Public Choice, 54, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C., & Saussier, S. (2000). Contractual choice and performance: the case of water supply in France. Revue d’Économie Industrielle, 92, 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miralles, A. (2008, in press). A duration model analysis of privatization of municipal water services in Spain. Revista de Economía Aplicada.

  • Miranda, R. A. (1994). Explaining the privatization decision among local governments in the United States. Research in Urban Policy, 5, 231–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. R., Hirlinger, M. W., & England, R. E. (1988). The decision to contract out city services: a further explanation. Western Political Quarterly, 41, 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mur, M. (2008). Contratación externa de servicios locales en Aragón: Residuos sólidos y distribución de agua. Universidad de Zaragoza: Unpublished doctoral thesis.

  • Nelson, M. A. (1997). Municipal government approaches to service delivery: an analysis from a transaction cost perspective. Economic Inquiry, 35, 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, H. (2003). Ownership and production costs: choosing between public production and contracting-out in the case of Swedish refuse collection. Fiscal Studies, 24, 451–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perard, E. (2007). Water supply: Public or private? An approach based on costs of funds, transaction costs, efficiency and political costs. Paper presented at The role of the state in public service delivery conference. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, September 2007.

  • Rose, A. K., & Stanley, T. D. (2005). A meta-analysis of the effect of common currencies on international trade. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 347–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. D. (2001). Wheat from chaff: meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. D. (2005a). Integrating the empirical tests of the natural rate hypothesis: a meta-regression analysis. Kyklos, 58, 611–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. D. (2005b). Beyond publication bias. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 309–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. D. (2008). Meta-regression methods for detecting and estimating empirical effects in the presence of publication selection. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. D., & Jarrell, S. B. (1989). Meta-regression analysis: a quantitative method of literature surveys. Journal of Economic Surveys, 3, 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. M. (1990). Urban Alternatives. Public and private markets in the provision of local services. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B. J. (1978). Scale, market structure, and the cost of refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 438–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, M., Macauley, M., & Anderson, S. (2005). Private markets, contracts, and government provision. What explains the organization of local waste and recycling markets? Urban Affairs Review, 40, 590–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M., & Bel, G. (2008). Competition or monopoly? Comparing privatization of local public services in the US and Spain. Public Administration, 86, 723–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. E., & Hebdon, R. (2001). Local government restructuring: privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M., & Hefetz, A. (2002). Applying market solutions to public services: an assessment of efficiency, equity and voice. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zullo, R. (2005). Determinants of public service privatization and inter-municipal contracting (Working Paper). University of Michigan.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economic Policy, University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 690, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

    Germà Bel & Xavier Fageda

  2. Barcelona Graduate School of Economics, Barcelona, Spain

    Germà Bel

Authors
  1. Germà Bel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xavier Fageda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Fageda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bel, G., Fageda, X. Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis. Public Choice 139, 105–119 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9381-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9381-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation